United States | Great exhortations

How (and why) J.D. Vance does it

The vice-presidency is a famously terrible job and Donald Trump a famously bad boss. And yet

JD Vance speaks to an auditorium full of people
Photograph: Jamie Kelter Davis/New York Times/Redux/Eyevine
|WASHINGTON, DC

The safe choice for vice-president was not J.D. Vance. He arrived on Donald Trump’s presidential ticket with little political experience and plenty of baggage. During his two years in the Senate some senior colleagues found the Ohio freshman’s strident opposition to Republican policy orthodoxy presumptuous. And more than a few Republican lawmakers and donors still privately acknowledge they would have preferred someone else. Yet the vice-president, the third-youngest in American history, has proved adept at a role that often ends up as a political dead end. And Mr Vance, seen by America’s allies as a divisive figure, is casting himself as a uniter of his party’s fractious factions. He argues that he was uniquely placed to bridge the gap between the “techno-optimist” and “populist right” MAGA tribes.

Explore more

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Great exhortations”

From the April 5th 2025 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition
Portrait of US President Donald Trump sat in shadow during a cabinet meeting at the White House.

Donald Trump’s approval rating is dropping

He is beating his own record for rapidly annoying American voters

The Democrat donkey with a light bulb inside his head ans loads of people working in his brain.

Can Progressives learn to make progress again?

In the political wilderness, Democrats are asking themselves how they lost their way


Tracking Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown

And why that is increasingly hard to do


America’s progressives should love standardised tests

New evidence in a long-running argument

Abortion becomes more common in some US states that outlawed it

Shield laws have profound implications for how federalism works

Will the Supreme Court empower Trump to sack the Fed’s boss?

A case that tests the president’s power to dismiss officials has implications for the central bank